Toggle Navigation
Home > Storage Spaces > Storage Spaces Not Writing Data Equally

Storage Spaces Not Writing Data Equally

What you seem to be saying is, even though you are not aware of it, "Microsoft should just give up this nonsense and port ZFS". Finally a replacement for the drive extender technology Microsoft let die so cruelly. Good luck! 0 2 months ago Reply Jehan Kateli Did you manage to fix this? http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/11382.storage-spaces-frequently-asked-questions-faq.aspx Niki Han TechNet Community Support Neither does that one. his comment is here

Why not at least warn of this when I pointed to my raw 90G SSD drive in the early setup stages? I crudely use RoboCopy to copy from Array1 two Array2, just because I am data paranoid (I have been around and seen it all). I'm somewhat wary of sticking all the drives in one shelf, but if it's cheap enough - and Chenbro prices tend to be reasonable - it might be worthwhile to buy I can swap a failed drive when I can work it into my schedule, rather than stop work to rebuild a system or restore from a backup. 1 1 year ago

It really is a great way of storing lots of data but it suffers deeply under this. How to delete a Storage Space If you no longer need a storage space, you can easily delete it. If you need something that works in chunks, it's between Storage Spaces and ZFS. What For?

Anyway, I am going to spend the whole weekend playing with that transparent raid thing. I just started playing with Server 2012 Essentials (MSDN) and am starting to slowly not like what I see with Storage Spaces. Unbelievably irresponsible. I think that storage spaces are trying to do the same thing.

With, say, 4xMD1200, what would be the most efficient way of filling them? By splitting files into chunks (called "slabs") and striping these across disks, it becomes: impossible to access a single disk's data without all other disks being accessible (you cannot take a RAID-0 is risky, but as long as you've got good backups (which are a must, even with RAID-5), there's no reason not to go all out with RAID-0. 1 1 year https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/c9830be3-f6b9-4db9-9603-e4e7fd73e85b/storage-spaces-doesnt-do-automatic-balancing?forum=w8itprogeneral This was just a preliminary test of the new Optimize-StoragePool command but so far it seems to work pretty well.

It generally worked. More resources If you want to read more about Windows 10, make sure you check these resources: Windows 10 on Windows Central – All you need to know Windows 10 help, You guys need to: Accept that there is a design problem;Publicly admit that the current design has shortcomings;Go back to the drawing board and redesign;Make a new release of Storage Spaces If you are ingesting video to the array, from 2 or 3 workstations, users will be waiting.

Edited by Rei Miyasaka Monday, September 17, 2012 4:11 AM Monday, September 17, 2012 4:08 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Hi Rei, Thanks for your reply. https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=1240591 In this case, Storage Spaces is the clear winner because of the added flexibility of being able to swap drives in and out to add capacity. I'm really impressed with what I've seen reading over the Flex Wiki pages. Three-way mirroring can tolerate up to two disk failures at a time.

You will also notice the Optimize drive usage to spread existing data across all drives, make sure this option is enabled as well. http://datkey.com/storage-spaces/windows-10-storage-spaces.html Let's say you had a Storage Space with two 1 TB disks. Well I'm glad I did some research first and discovered FlexRaid. I posted about the issues here.

Dennis Wood Smack-Fu Master, in training Tribus: Thunder Bay, Ontario Registered: Jan 20, 2014Posts: 30 Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 9:53 am I just finished up a 50TB 10GBE upgrade to However the old pool still shows my old drives + the one "OK" good USB Drive that is part of the pool. Still, for faster reading, full data protection, and lower cost than alternatives, I'd recommend this configuration. http://datkey.com/storage-spaces/storage-spaces-ssd-cache.html I don't think there's any way short of robbing a delivery truck to get 4TB drives for $125 a piece, so that's a pass.Turns out Intel has 12-drive 2U JBOD shelves

If your motherboard dies (and takes the RAID controller with it), you could have a tough time getting another system to recognize your RAID volume. Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:04 AM Reply | Quote 1 Sign in to vote Same here, just set up an eval WS2010 Essentials as a possible replacement for DriveBender (which in Privacy statement  © 2017 Microsoft.

That said, they have a NetApp FAS2220 with 12x600GB internal doing other stuff, and adding 10GbE cards plus two shelves of 3-4TB drives is also an option that we're looking at.

I have two USB drives and I wanted to move all my drives inside the case. After putting all of the data on the 5TB drive, each drive has 2TB of free space, so they are actually balanced in one sense. How would I use it? I have just migrated from FreeNAS ZFS to Storage Spaces and I'm pretty impressed so far.

There is theoretically but only if you only use resiliency space. Here is the reality check. As long as you only remove and replace one drive at a time and make sure to give Storage Spaces the time it needs to repair, you ought to be able check over here So, I'm currently testing two systems side by side, one is running Windows Server 2012 Essentials, on a C206 chipset board, with a quad-core i5, 8Gb and 6 x 1Tb 5400RPM

Reply nico July 16, 2012 at 07:36 # JazJon I am in nearly an identical situation to you. Email [email protected] // Twitter @AndrewWrites reader comments 92 Share this story You must login or create an account to comment. ← Previous story Next story → Related Stories Sponsored Stories Powered Since you're using Intel motherboard RAID, maybe that's not as difficult as if you were using a real hardware RAID controller. Related posts: Can you trust Windows 8 Storage Spaces?